« July 2006 | Main | September 2006 »

August 31, 2006

Google's Video Broadcast of its Most Recent Update

Matt Cutts, Google's User Relations blogger, now does a video broadcast of the state of the Google nation

It says a lot that a PageRank update, or algorithm & data push, now warrants a video broadcast of its own.

The transcript of the broadcast is

Hey everybody, good to see you again! I thought I’d talk about datacenter updates, what to expect for the next few weeks in Google, and stuff like that this time. (...)

There is always an update going on, practically daily, if not daily. A pretty large fraction of our index is updated every day as we crawl the web.

We also have algorithms and data pushes that are going out on a less frequent basis. For example there was a data push on June 27th, July 27th, and then August 17th. And again, that’s not [recent?], that’s going on for 1.5 years. If you seem to be caught in that, you’re more likely to be reading on an SEO board. You might wanna think about ways that you could back your site off... think less about what the SEOs on the board are saying, sort of not be optimizing quite as much on your site. That’s about as much advice as I can give I’m afraid.

You can see the amount of short term blackhat (illegal) SEO work going on. Our analysis at Enclick is that Google search has taken a leap forward in quality, eliminating more spam from its results. Together with Adsense vastly improving the quality of its advertisers by effectively removing spam pages from its client list.

One nice thing is we have another software infrastructure update which improves quality as the main aspect, but also improves our site crawling estimates as well. It’s just sort of like a side benefit. I know that that is out on all datacenters in the sense that it can run in some experimental modes, but it’s not fully on in every datacenter. We were shooting for the end of the summer to have that live everywhere, but again that’s a hope, not a promise. So if things need more testing they’ll work for longer to make sure everything goes smoothly, and if everything goes great, then they might roll it out faster.

The whole notion of watching datacenters is going to get harder and harder for individuals going forward. Because number 1, we have so much stuff launching in various ways. I’ve seen weekly launch meetings where there are a double digit number of things, and these are things that are under the hood. So they’re strictly quality, they’re not changing the UI or anything like that. If you’re not doing a specific search in Russian, or Chinese, you might not notice the difference. But it goes to show that we’re always rolling out different things, and at different data centers you might have slightly different data.

The other reason why it’s not as much worth watching datacenters is because there’s an entire set of IP addresses. And if you’re a super-duper gung ho SEO, you’ll know “72.2.14.whatever”. That IP address will typically go to one datacenter, but that’s not a guarantee. If that one datacenter comes out of rotation – you know, we’re gonna do something else to it, we’re gonna actually change the hardware infrastructure (and everything I’ve been talking about so far is software infrastructure) – then that IP address can point to a completely different datacenter.

So the currency, the ability to really compare changes and talk to a fellow datacenter watcher and say, “What do you see at 72.7.14.whatever?” is really pretty limited. I would definitely encourage you to spend more time worrying about the results you rank for, increasing the quality of your content, looking for high-quality people that you think should be linking to you and aren’t linking to you (and not even know about that), stuff like that. (...)

The fact of the matter is, we’re always going be working on improving our infrastructure, so you can never guarantee a ranking, or a number 1 for any given term. Because if we find out that we can improve quality by changing our algorithms or data or infrastructure, or anything else, we’re going to make that change. The best SEOs in my experience are the ones that can adapt, and that say “OK, this is the way the algorithms look right now to me, if I want to make a good site that will do well in search engines, this is the direction I want to head in next.” And if you work on those sort of skills, then you don’t have to worry as much about being up at 3am, and talk on a forum about “What does this datacenter look like to you, did it change a whole lot?” and stuff like that.

There seem to be a lot of data-centers watchers, just like weather enthusiasts. Fortunately, we undertake longer term search engine optimsation. We focus on achieving good search positioning for long periods of time, building on the fundamentals, rather than short term weekly improvements. Can't imagine anybody in the team being this obsessive. [Transcript courtesy of Google Blogscoped]

Technorati Tags: ,

August 23, 2006

DMOZ Editor Charging $300 for Listings

dmoz

DMOZ, the open content directory public directory, works through volunteer editors. Thousands of editors sift through submissions to their directory sections and try and edit a quality list of diretories.

Over the years most search engines, notably Google, Yahoo and MSN, have used the DMOZ directory structure and content. Google especially uses DMOZ for its directory section.

Being listed on DMOZ is a cornerstone exercise for any search engine optmisation project. So DMOZ is subject to a lot of gaming, and DMOZ editors are usually slow in processing sites.

In an unprecedented twist, one DMOZ editor has just been ousted for charging for listing into his section. To get reviewed the editor charged

Within a year: $50.00
Within 6 Months: $75.00
Within 3 Months: $90.00
Within 1 Month: $125.00
Within 2 Weeks: $180.00
Within 1 Week: $225.00
Within 3 Days: $275.00
Within 24 hours: $300.00
ASAP: $350.00
A pretty outrageous move considering DMOZ is a public domain, volunteer service. [Via WebProWorld ]

Technorati Tags:

August 16, 2006

Google Analytics Opens For Everybody

google analytics

Brett Crosby, founder of Urchin and now Google Analytics Chief, announces open doors for Google Analytics subscriptions again.

Google launched free web analytics service late last year. The service is based on the popular Urchin software acquired by Google in April 2005. Such was the popularity of the uptake that Google struggled to provide timely statistics, so subscribing to analytics was made invitation only, until today.

Google's free service is competitive in the paid service arena, comparing well with dominant services like webtrends. The more complex conversion analysis functions, where other services like statcounter.com fail, are quite usable after setup. Google offers tutorials on conversion analysis since, for online merchants, the goal of web analytics is conversion optimisation.

Given how time consuming conversion optimisation is, clients often request the Enclick team complete its conversion optimisation study .

Technorati Tags: ,

August 14, 2006

Froogle Demoted from Google Home Page in the US

Google's home page customarily shows a Froogle link, as shown in the figure of the UK Homepage below.

But, in a move aimed no doubt at catching up with the video content explosion on the web, as witnessed by the rise of youtube.com video service, the Froogle link has been replaced by a Google Video link.

The result on Froogle's traffic has been pretty dramatic, as shown in the latest Hitiwise statistics of Google Video

Technorati Tags: ,

August 11, 2006

Google Webmaster Tool: The Sitemap Submission

Google sitemap submission program keeps getting more interesting. It is becoming the best way to "talk to Google about your website results".

with the webmaster tool you can tell Google that www.domain.com and domain.com are the same

  • out robots.txt files
  • discover crawl errors that Googlebot saw
  • see some spam penalties

Vanessa Fox of the Google sitemap team goes over the new features

Technorati Tags:

August 1, 2006

What is Natural Linking ? Five Tips on Google Guidelines

The success of Google's search algorithm centers round using inbound links to a website to judge its relevance and importance relative to a keyword.

Over the years, SEO companies have come up with link building techniques to up their client's websites in Google's ranking. Google's original algorithm is being manipulated by all these techniques, and many high ranking sites are often irrelevant and unimportant. But Google keeps fighting back.

Such have been Google's improvements, that some declare that SEO is dead. Google has become skilled at detecting un-natural linking patterns; links to a website whose only purpose is to improve Google ranking. Many SEO experts are going back to fundamentals: What is a natural link ?

A Natural Link: The Referencing of Good Content by an Informative Author

Google's algorithm, as filed in Google's US Patent Application #20050071741 - Information Retrieval Based on Historical Data, is based on the Garfield's Scientific Citation Index, which is used to judge importance of research papers in the world of academic publishing.

Scientists write their results in research papers. Each research paper references all the other work that has contributed to its results. Important research papers that make a big breakthrough, give rise to more investigations, and are referenced widely. This citing and referencing is what the Google algorithm is looking for. Natural value-added links.

So, what does the natural linking look like:

1. Natural links are deeplinks. Links that point to specific material deep within the body of knowledge.

Deep linking is linking that points to a specific page or image within another website, as opposed to linking to a website's main or home page. Deeplinking goes hand in hand with the long tail.

2. Natural linking is not reciprocal. Scientific papers are published sequentially in time. More recent papers reference older papers as they try and build the body of knowledge. Link exchanging, where websites exchange links, is not natural.

3. Natural links are built slowly over time. A seminal academic paper accumulates references, links, slowly over time. It is only well established highly regarded academic papers, like the discovery of DNA, that accumulate large number of references quickly.

4. Natural links make a point. Academics construct an argument around their references. So natural references are surrounded by relevant text and have specific anchor text, as each scientists tries to make his own point. The ratio of number of links to text has an upper limit, the density of links is relatively low, and the context surrounding the reference is relevant material.

5. Natural links come from everywhere. Scientists publish their research in many places. From important journals, like "Nature", to less important conference proceedings. So, natural links come from varied sources of relevant material.

Search Engine Optimisation is not dead, but it just got harder

Technorati Tags: , , ,


Search Engine Friendly Solutions - Shopping Channel - Online Survey - Site Search Solution - Shopping Data Feeds - Affiliate Network Data Feeds - Search Engine Indexer - Sitemap - Search Engine Optimisation